Challenges in Implementing Participatory Poverty Research with Children: Methodological and Ethical Reflections for Practice in Japan

Sheng Chen

doi:10.58671/aswj.v14i1.127

Authors

Sheng Chen Junior College Division, Shokei University, Japan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58671/aswj.v14i1.127

Keywords:

poverty, children, participatory poverty research, methodology, research ethics

Abstract

This study examines the challenges of implementing participatory poverty research with children. Conventional poverty research has largely been led by adult researchers, and the concept of child poverty has been constructed without clarifying how children perceive poverty. Although Japanese scholars have recently begun calling for incorporating children’s perspectives into poverty research, little progress has been made in developing empirical methodologies. To address this issue, in addition to the “expert knowledge” of researchers, participatory research in which children take an active role as participants is important. However, due to practical difficulties in implementation, participatory poverty research in Japan remains limited, with most efforts focused on adults and little to no involvement of children. This study draws on participatory poverty research with children in the UK, which has a rich history of such research. Using a framework developed from participatory poverty research with adults in Japan, this study examines how the challenges identified in that framework are manifested and addressed in UK studies with children. Through this analysis, the study aims to clarify specific methodological and ethical considerations for future practice in Japan.

Author Biography

Sheng Chen, Junior College Division, Shokei University, Japan

Sheng CHEN is an assistant professor at Junior College Division, Shokei University, Japan. He obtained his Ph.D. from Hokkaido University. His research interests include poverty, social policy, and social justice. He is an Advanced Social Researcher accredited by the Japanese Association for Social Research and a certified Social Worker

References

Association of Social Anthropologists of the UK. (2021). Ethical Guidelines 2021 for good research practice, https://www.theasa.org/downloads/ethics/asa_ethicsgl_2021.pdf

Bennett, F. & Roberts, M. (2004). From input to influence, participatory approaches to research and inquiry into poverty. Joseph Rowntree Foundation.

Beresford, P., Green, D., Lister, R., & Woodard, K. (1999). Poverty first hand: Poor people speak for themselves. Child Poverty Action Group.

British Psychological Society (2021). BPS Code of Human Research Ethics, https://explore.bps.org.uk/content/report-guideline/bpsrep.2021.inf180

Carter, M., Petch, H. (2000). Listen hear: The right to be heard. The Policy Press.

Chen, S. (2021). The challenges in conducting participatory approaches to poverty inquiry that include poor people, Hokkaido Social Welfare Study, 41,24–34, [Published in Japanese]. http://hdl.handle.net/2115/82816

Chen, S. (2022). The implementation of the participatory poverty research: focusing on the procedures of the research for “participation”, Bulletin of Faculty of Education, Hokkaido University, 140, 203–225, [Published in Japanese]. https://doi.org/10.14943/b.edu.140.203

Chen, S. (2024). People in poverty talk about “What is poverty?”: The potential of participatory poverty research. Hokkaido University Press [Published in Japanese].

del Tufo, S., & Gaster, L. (2002). Evaluation of the Commission on Poverty, Participation and Power. Joseph Rowntree Foundation.

Farthing, R. (2016). What’s wrong with being poor? The problems of poverty, as young people describe them, Children & Society, 30(2), 107–119. https://doi.org/10.1111/chso.12107

Hart, R. A. (1992). Children’s participation: From tokenism to citizenship. Florence, Italy: United Nations Children’s Fund International Child Development Centre.

Hart, R. A. (2008). Stepping back from “the ladder”: Reflections on a model of participatory work with children. In Reid, A., Nikel, J.,

Jensen, B. B. (Ed.), & Simovska, V. (Ed.), Participation and Learning: perspectives on Education and the Environment, Health and Sustainability. Springer.

James, A. (1995). Methodologies of Competence for a Competent Methodology?, paper presented at the Children and Social Competence Conference, Guildford, Surrey, July.

The Japanese Psychological Association (2009). Code of Ethics and Conduct, https://psych.or.jp/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/rinri_kitei.pdf

Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare and Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry. (2021). Ethical Guidelines for Medical and Biological Research Involving Human Subjects, https://www.mext.go.jp/content/20250325-mxt_life-000035486-01.pdf

Morrow, R. & Richards, M. (1996). The Ethics of Social Research with Children: An Overview, Children & Society, 10(2), 90–105. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1099-0860.1996.tb00461.x

Ridge, T. (2002). Childhood poverty and social exclusion: From a child’s perspective. Policy Press.

Sime, D. (2008). Ethical and methodological issues in engaging young people living in poverty with participatory research methods, Children’s Geographies, 6(1), 63–78, https://doi.org/10.1080/14733280701791926

Sutton, L., Smith, N., Dearden, C., & Middleton, S. (2007). A child’s-eye view of social difference. Joseph Rowntree Foundation.

Thompson, R. A. (1992). Developmental changes in research risk and benefit: A changing calculus of concerns. In Stanley, B. & Sieber, J. E. (Eds.), Social research on children and adolescents: Ethical issues. Sage Publications, Inc.

United Nations. (1989). Convention on the Rights of the Child, https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/convention-rights-child

Willow, R. (2001). The bread is free: children and young people talk about poverty. Children’s Rights Alliance for England.